Search Index

How they're used in treatments Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp LinkedIn Pinterest Copy link A new model: miniature organs in biomedicine 23/10/25, 10:21 Last updated: Published: 16/10/23, 21:39 How they're used in treatments Introduction Within biomedicine, the study of diseases and understanding their mechanisms are crucial to the treatments we can develop for them. Before a treatment option can be rolled out to the general public, it must be tested for safety and efficacy. Usually, this testing takes place in the form of cell cultures or animal models. However, these methods cannot always accurately replicate the human body's complexity and physiological responses and are sometimes quite expensive and difficult to maintain. In the past few years, a new model has come to light known as organoids, allowing for a new realm of understanding into drug development, disease, and human biology. What Are Organoids? Organoids are self-organised, small, three-dimensional organ models which allow scientists and researchers to study different biological organs and tissues in a lab setting, including their physiological functions, development, and structure. These miniature organs are remarkable in their resemblance to actual organs and are obtained from stem cells, and they can undergo division to become any cell type. From their theoretical abilities, organoids may be able to serve utmost value in biomedicine and how we think about testing new treatments. Disease Modelling, Drug Development and Personalised Medicine One of the ways in which organoids can be used is to model diseases and test for potential drug targets and treatment programmes. In this way, researchers can replicate congenital and acquired conditions, such as cystic fibrosis and cancer, to study key target phenotypes and understand disease progression, which can help identify potential drug targets. From here, the efficacy of these therapeutics can be assessed quite quickly under different circumstances. As an example of this being used currently, scientists involved in cancer research have produced organoids from tumour cells stemming from cancer patients. These patient-derived organoids have been made for various cancers, including endometrium. They will allow for the ability to test chemotherapy drugs and determine which are most effective for individual patients whilst factoring in comorbidities and other unique factors to that person. Through this personalised approach, it is hoped that therapeutics will allow for a customised treatment programme which lowers the risk of side effects and improves the quality of care. Understanding Development and Function Another use of organoids is going into more depth and exploring our understanding of how an organ may develop and function. Using organoids can help us observe how different cells may work together and interact to organise themselves, allowing researchers to strengthen their knowledge of organogenesis by mimicking the natural growth conditions of the human environment. By combining tissue engineering with an appreciation of an organ's functional and developmental processes, organoid use can be extended to regenerative medicine to help fill research gaps in the molecular and cellular mechanisms of tissue regeneration. Techniques such as ELISA and immunofluorescent staining can help garner these critical details. By achieving this, organoids may produce entire organs for transplantation, addressing the organ donor shortage and lowering the risk of donor rejection. Recent Breakthroughs Cardiovascular diseases are one of the leading causes of death around the world. The human heart is limited to regenerating damaged tissue; thus, research must explore using organoids and other cell-based therapies to encourage natural repair processes. By investigating this avenue, cardiomyocytes derived from human pluripotent stem cells are a promising source. These cell types have the potential to restore contractile functions in animal models as well as the ability to regenerate myocardial tissue. Researchers have developed a cardiac organoid with silicon nanowires that have significantly improved the medicinal efficacy of stem cell-derived cardiac organoids. Using these nano-wired organoids, electrical activity was shown to improve, which in turn supported improved contractility in ischemia-injured mice. Challenges and Future Directions While the promising nature of organoids must be acknowledged, they are not without limitations. Research is currently ongoing to improve the reproducibility and scalability of organoids and their cultures to make organoids more accessible and their use more widespread. Below are some summarised advantages and disadvantages of organoids. Conclusion In conclusion, the advent of organoids has created a revolutionary era within the scope of biomedicine. These miniature organs have remarkable potential in various research, development, and tissue engineering facets. Organoids provide scientists with precise modelling of diseases across a range of different organs, assuring their versatility. From understanding organ development to combating cardiovascular diseases and introducing personalised treatment for cancer patients, it is unclear why they are being more rapidly explored. While they hold their promise, there are still challenges surrounding their reproducibility, restricting them from being used in organ transplantation. However, with ongoing progress, organoids undoubtedly have the aptitude to tailor treatments and address complexities of tissue regeneration, heralding a groundbreaking era in healthcare. Written by Irha Khalid Related article: iPSCs and organoids / Animal testing ethics Project Gallery

The potential of MSCs to treat diseases like rheumatoid arthritis Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp LinkedIn Pinterest Copy link The role of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in regenerative medicine 23/10/25, 10:18 Last updated: Published: 28/11/24, 15:16 The potential of MSCs to treat diseases like rheumatoid arthritis This is article no. 2 in a three-part series on stem cells. Next article: Regulation and policy of stem cell research . Previous article: An introduction to stem cells . Welcome to the second article in a series of three articles about stem cells. I will explore mesenchymal stem cells and their role in regenerative medicine in this article. Additionally, I will consider the potential of mesenchymal stem cells in treating three different diseases: multiple sclerosis (MS), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Consider reading Article 1 for more information on mesenchymal stem cells! Multiple sclerosis (MS) Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease affecting the brain and spinal cord. It can cause symptoms such as muscle stiffness and spasms, problems with balance and coordination, vision problems and more. According to the Multiple Sclerosis Society UK (MS Society UK), it is estimated that there are around 150,000 people with MS in the UK, with nearly 7,100 people being newly diagnosed every year. Scientists have found that MSCs can be used to treat some of the symptoms of MS as MSCs protect the nerves in the CNS by secreting substances called neurotrophic growth factors, which increase nerve growth and the survival of nerve cells. These neurotrophic growth factors can also repair damaged nerves, improving nerve function. However, the exact mechanisms of this are still being studied. Furthermore, MSCs can activate the brain's natural healing mechanisms by stimulating the brain's stem cells to become active and repair the damaged tissue. This results in patients having a reduction in symptoms and the severity of the symptoms, improving the quality of life for those with MS. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease affecting the joints. The charity Versus Arthritis has said there are around 400,000 adults aged 16 and over affected by RA in the UK. Scientists have found that MSCs can reduce inflammation in the joints as they have immunomodulatory properties, so they can regulate the immune system's abnormal responses that cause RA. MSCs suppress immune cell activity, resulting in a decrease in inflammation and joint damage. In addition, MSCs can migrate (travel) to the inflamed joints and release anti-inflammatory molecules, reducing joint swelling and pain. This results in patients having a reduction in pain and joint swelling, improving the quality of life for those with RA. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is an umbrella term for chronic inflammatory digestive diseases, including ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease (CD), affecting the gastrointestinal tract. A study by the University of Nottingham estimates that 500,000 people in the UK are living with IBD. Scientists have found that MSCs can reduce inflammation and increase tissue repair in the gastrointestinal tract. This is because MSCs can migrate to sites of inflammation in the gut, where they can replace damaged tissue cells. MSCs release signalling molecules that regulate the immune response and reduce inflammation. They can even directly interact with immune cells in the gut, influencing their behaviour and decreasing the inflammatory response. Also, MSCs can transfer mitochondria to damaged cells through cell fusion, helping the damaged cells function better and reduce inflammation. This results in reduced inflammation in patients, improving the quality of life for those with IBD. Looking to the future MS, RA and IBD are just three of the multiple diseases MSCs can target, and while there are many refinements to be made for MSCs to become more viable as treatment options, current findings show promising results. With further development, including more research to understand the exact biology of MSCs, there is massive potential for this method to revolutionise the treatment of various diseases, including cardiovascular diseases, liver diseases and cancer. As stem cell research continues to advance, policies must also adapt to this changing landscape; watch out for the last article in the series, where I will discuss the regulation and policy of stem cell research! Written by Naoshin Haque Related articles: The biggest innovations in the biosciences / Neuromyelitis optica and MS / Crohn's disease Project Gallery

How colonialism, interventionism and health are interwoven Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp LinkedIn Pinterest Copy link How colonialism and geopolitics shape health injustices: a deep, critical reflection Last updated: 23/10/25, 10:16 Published: 16/10/25, 07:00 How colonialism, interventionism and health are interwoven This is the final article (article no. 7) in a series about global health injustices. Previous article: Addressing the health landscape in Bangladesh's Rohingya community Introduction Welcome to the reflective article of the Global Health Injustices Series. Before I begin, I want to thank Jana Antar again for her contributions to the Lebanon and Syria article, and Dr Nasif Mahmood for his contributions to the Rohingya people in Bangladesh article. Writing and researching about these different countries was an incredible experience. Although I initially planned for this series to go beyond ten articles, focusing on the most enduring and neglected injustices was vital, particularly as the world is becoming more dynamic with geopolitical power shifts. With this in mind, I want to emphasise that each vulnerable population faces unique challenges, but they have challenges shared with others that are not mentioned in this series. I wanted to address these injustices because they are urgent and demonstrate how interconnected global struggles truly are. Through writing this last article, I deepened my understanding of how colonialism, interventionism, and health are interwoven. How the past impacts present reality (colonialism) The injustices we see in news headlines, social media, or the ones we directly experience should not be understood as isolated examples ( Table 1 ). Instead, they stem from European colonialism and later foreign interventionism, shaping how regional governments were created. The ongoing Gaza genocide and expanding illegal settlements pushing out Palestinians in the West Bank are due to Israel’s brutal military occupation and apartheid for 70+ years, and its acts, including the Nakba. Sudan had external rulers (notably Egypt and the British Empire) contributing to its civil wars through political destabilisation, among other factors. This similarly happened in Yemen, though it is also important to note that foreign intervention from the United States (US) and Saudi Arabian governments contributed to the country's existing crises. Lebanon and Syria were divided up and governed by Britain and France after the Ottoman Empire collapsed shortly after World War 1, a significant event leading to political destabilisation and ongoing catastrophes, which also happened to Palestine. In Kashmir, the people’s plight erupted through the British Empire partitioning the Indian subcontinent into multiple nations in 1947 (India, West Pakistan becoming Pakistan and East Pakistan becoming Bangladesh), with Kashmir being a disputed territory between Pakistan and India. As for the Rohingya population and Bangladesh, civil wars during the 20th century and ensuing persecution by the government of Myanmar have contributed to their crises. Therefore, it is clear that all of these events I summarised showcase how their root causes lead to the substantial effects of the current daily injustices. Moreover, what connects these substantial injustices and many others worldwide traces back to the consequences of European colonialism; these powers dispossessed indigenous peoples of their lands and resources through violence, subsequently broken treaties, or legal frameworks that did not identify Indigenous land tenure systems. While they did disrupt indigenous governments, some recent injustices prevail because post-colonial elites embraced or exacerbated these exploitative systems. This severed deep cultural, spiritual, and economic ties that indigenous communities had with their land. For example, Canada’s colonial legacy, notably its Indian Residential Schools, involved forcibly removing children from their families, leading to negative outcomes for the Indigenous communities. Moreover, it is vital to acknowledge the impact of settler colonialism on Indigenous communities globally across South America, Africa, Asia and the Aboriginal people of Australia and New Zealand. If we do not critically think and learn about these past events, how will we improve our present reality and build a future for everyone? Table 1: Summary of the historical and modern perpetrators of injustices affecting the countries/communities explored in the Global Health Injustices Series Country/ community explored in the Global Health Injustices Series Main perpetrator(s) of their injustices Palestine Israel + foreign military aid from the US, UK + other countries Sudan RSF + other local political factions with foreign military aid from the UAE + other countries Yemen Houthis + other local political factions + foreign Interventionism from Saudi Arabia + US + foreign military aid Lebanon Local political factions + US, UK + other countries Syria Local political factions + US, UK + other countries Kashmir Indian + Pakistani militaries + foreign military aid Rohinyga Government of Myanmar + foreign military aid Bangladesh UK via the partition of Subcontinental India (1947), contributing to later injustices Current major health problems Health is essential in global injustices because it is a mirror and a driver of the disparities among various populations. Accessing quality healthcare is usually affected by factors, such as race and ethnicity, which accentuate deep-rooted inequalities. For example, communities with lower incomes encounter challenges, ranging from a lack of healthcare infrastructure to environmental hazards, leading to worse health outcomes. Therefore, tackling them is essential for achieving justice, as improved health outcomes can empower marginalised groups. Aside from warfare being a major determinant of health and injustice, I want to highlight migration as a significant co-occurring determinant. Although research is expanding, the bidirectional relationship between migration and health remains inadequately incorporated into practice and laws. Migration is a complicated and heterogeneous multiphase process ( Figure 1 ). Meanwhile, collecting migration data remains difficult due to polarised political views, unwillingness to finance research on discriminatory laws, varying migration definitions, and limited comparable global data. Unfortunately, political rhetoric and media depictions form incorrect assumptions, stereotypes, and negative views of migrants and refugees, leading to a weakened understanding of the severity and positive aspects of migration. Also, this manifests into hatred and scapegoating of migrants and refugees through their “perceived” impact on countries like employment and healthcare. In reality, accessing employment and healthcare is very difficult for them, leading to negative health outcomes. Thinking more broadly, health behaviours are not solely individual choices, but are deeply rooted in and affected by social, cultural, and political environments. For example, when looking at politics and health through a framework ( Figure 2 ), it is clear how politics is influential through labour markets and welfare states, leading to socioeconomic, income and wealth inequalities and poor health. One systematic review found that a generous welfare state is typically associated with positive population health outcomes, with the Nordic model as an example. This suggests that political leaders are vital in affecting agendas, encouraging intersectoral partnerships, and showing political will to promote health equity. Another review supported the benefits of a generous welfare state through maternal and child health outcomes. Therefore, health and politics are intertwined, as addressed in previous articles through specific contexts. Now I will discuss it more broadly. Current major geopolitical problems Geopolitical dynamics are crucial to shaping the lives of vulnerable populations by influencing their access to security, resources, and fundamental human rights; this is impacted by governments, policies, geographies, and the relationships and interests between countries. In countries or regions plagued by continuous conflict or authoritarian governments, these communities often find themselves at greater risk of challenges like displacement, violence, and systemic discrimination. Moreover, the complicated relationship between global and local power systems results in specific communities being neglected, as more powerful geopolitical interests repeatedly overshadow their needs. To truly support these communities, it is vital to consider how foreign interventionism from countries like the US and the UK impacts the Palestinians, Sudanese, Lebanese, Syrian, Yemeni, Kashmiri, and the Rohingya populations. Foreign interventionism, which typically occurs through militarism, is characterised as the international and social relations of training for and executing organised political violence; this is a pervasive feature of geopolitics, rising into civilian domains by shaping countries and regions. Then, humanitarianism is typically seen as an unbiased moral discourse centred on universal humanity and aid. Yet, it is historically linked to militarism, particularly in Western countries and has deepened in recent decades. Humanitarian standards, like International Humanitarian Law (IHL), are supposed to limit wars’ consequences, but IHL may implicitly tolerate particular levels of ‘collateral damage’ as allowable. IHL is embedded in a hierarchy that determines who can be saved and who cannot, possibly causing inequalities and unstable power relations tied to imperial dynamics. Hence, I see Western humanitarianism as deeply entangled with militarism because of how it can serve to justify and expand political violence across diverse countries and regions, as seen in modern news headlines. More importantly, this dynamic drives a vicious cycle of violence, where armed conflicts cause vulnerability by destroying infrastructure, destabilising nations and other negative consequences, like climate change and rising extremism, leading to civil wars and genocide. Moving forward To truly move forward, adopting a multifaceted approach (e.g. decolonising global health) to addressing all the injustices and health disparities is vital; this can work, but I think that should involve giving all the most vulnerable communities their autonomy, liberation and fundamental human rights. There is the notion of peace plans coming from Western governments like the US, yet that cannot start without putting those directly experiencing war, genocide, displacement, ethnic cleansing and other atrocities as the central voice in those conversations. Moreover, we should highlight those most accountable for making amends. For example, they should allow a right to return and a payment of extensive reparations to the displaced Palestinians, Sudanese, Lebanese, Syrian, Yemeni, Kashmiri, and the Rohingya populations to their homelands, among numerous others. The big question is whether these suggestions will become tangible realities. Although reparations and the right to return may seem distant from contemporary political realities, they are moral imperatives for real justice to occur. Continuously raising awareness and rallying support for affected communities so they can tackle their needs and challenges is important. There is also advocacy, which is vital in showcasing the issues they encounter, which can pave the way for significant policy changes. Moreover, the participation of local and international non-governmental organisations (NGOs), like Amnesty International, is crucial for enforcing ongoing solutions, as they better grasp the vulnerable communities’ needs. When these efforts are done collaboratively, fostering a more supportive environment for those needing it most is vital. Unfortunately, NGOs cannot replace genuine international political will because their impact will always be limited without structural change. Importantly, recognising how interconnected everyone is as a global community is crucial. Engaging in different cultures and experiences should foster empathy and build a collective strength to face challenges, notably climate change and warfare driven by the weapons industry. Uniting and sharing knowledge can encourage real change and all countries actually following international law, which requires powerful countries to be held responsible in ways that have been avoided so far; this should involve acknowledging that the vulnerable communities have a right to resist and defend themselves against their oppressors. Conclusion The global health injustices seen today have historical roots in European colonialism, which has stripped indigenous global communities of their homelands and disrupted their cultural connections. Furthermore, they are influenced by many factors. Moreover, health behaviours are influenced by the broader social, cultural, and political landscapes. Geopolitical dynamics impact vulnerable populations by undermining their security, access to resources, and fundamental human rights; foreign interventionism via militarism makes them worse. Humanitarianism with militarism can reinforce cycles of violence by legitimising unequal power dynamics despite its good intentions. To effectively tackle the global health injustices, uplifting vulnerable communities by prioritising their human rights is vital. The perpetrators should pay reparations and grant the right of return to the most impacted. As individuals, we must raise awareness and push for policy changes. Local and international organisations are pivotal in understanding and addressing community needs. With everything said, I enjoyed writing this series because it showed me how connected all these injustices are and how we can act, listen and reflect together. Ultimately, we must focus on all the countries and communities highlighted in this series, as well as others currently facing injustices like the Uyghurs in China and Afghanistan. We must open our eyes, hearts, souls, and minds to nurture global connections and share knowledge for impactful change. Written by Sam Jarada Related articles: How does physical health affect mental health? / Beyond medicine: health through different stances / Regulation and policy of stem cell research REFERENCES Banat BYI, Entrena-Durán F, Dayyeh J. Palestinian Refugee Youth: Reproduction of Collective Memory of the Nakba. Asian Social Science. 2018 Nov 29;14(12):147.2. Amiad Haran Diman, Miodownik D. Bloody Pasts and Current Politics: The Political Legacies of Violent Resettlement. Comparative Political Studies. 2023 Aug 13;57(9). Abubakar M, Yahaya TB. Secession and border disputes in Africa: The case of Sudan and South Sudan border. African Journal of Political Science and International Relations. 2021 Oct 31;15(4):131–8. Tamer Abd Elkreem, Jaspars S. Sudan’s catastrophe: the role of changing dynamics of food and power in the Gezira agricultural scheme. Disasters [Internet]. 2024 Oct 30 [cited 2025 Sep 18];49(1). Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11603519/ eClinicalMedicine. Under the shade of world events: a never-ending crisis in Yemen. EClinicalMedicine [Internet]. 2023 Oct 1 [cited 2025 Sep 18];64:102302–2. Available from: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(23)00479-0/fulltext Bordón J, Eyad Alrefai. Saudi Arabia’s Foreign aid: the Singularity of Yemen as a Case Study. Third World Quarterly. 2023 Jul 14;45:1–18. Osman O. Western Domination, Destructive Governance, and the Perpetual Development Crisis in the Arab Region. World review of political economy. 2024 Apr 15;15(1). Huber D, Woertz E. Resilience, conflict and areas of limited statehood in Iraq, Lebanon and Syria. Democratization. 2021 Jun 25;28(7):1–19. Gupta H. 1947 Partition of India and its lessons. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care [Internet]. 2024 Jul 26 [cited 2025 Sep 18];13(8):3471–2. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11368293/ Jong K de, van, Ford N, Kamalini Lokuge, Fromm S, Galen R van, et al. Conflict in the Indian Kashmir Valley II: psychosocial impact. Conflict and Health [Internet]. 2008 Oct 14 [cited 2025 Sep 18];2(1). Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2577626/ Project Gallery

The properties and nature of matter, and energy. Read up on insights on astro-archaelogy, uncover the concept of building physics, and look at transformers. Physics Articles The properties and nature of matter, and energy. Read up on insights on astro-archaelogy, uncover the concept of building physics, and look at transformers. You may also like: Maths, Technology , Engineering Chaco Canyon, New Mexico Cities designed to track the heavens. Article #1 in a series on astro-archaelogy The Anthropic Principle Science or God? This theory is explained by physics Building Physics The field of study of how buildings interact with the environment to design comfortable and energy-efficient structures The pyramids of Giza, Egypt The astronomical symbolism of these great structures. Article #2 in a series on astro-archaelogy Lonar Lake The astro-geography of this structure in India Basics of transformers An overview on conventional transformers, and Ampere's Law and Faraday's Law The celestial blueprint of time The astronomical important of the structures at Stonehenge, UK. Article #3 in a series on astro-archaelogy Light How is light one of the biggest mysteries in physics? Looking at the Observer Effect and more Previous

​Dive into the latest biological research! Read about animal testing and ethics, discover how moving houses can affect your health in gentrification, and learn how specific organisms can survive in the extreme cold. Biology Articles Dive into the latest biological research! Read about animal testing and ethics, discover how moving houses can affect your health in gentrification, and learn how specific organisms can survive in the extreme cold. You may also like: Cancer , Ecology , Genetics , Immunology , Neuroscience , Zoology , and Medicine Animal testing and ethics A breakdown on the practices and procedures Gentrification in the context of health How does moving houses impact your well-being? Cryptosporidium crisis Investigating the outbreak in Devon, UK in May 2024 Survival secrets of the Arctic springtail How do springtails (Collembola) survive the extreme cold? An introduction to stem cells Cells that can differentiate into any other type of cell. Article #1 in a series on stem cells. Monkey see, monkey clone An outline of recent discoveries in cloning research Are we doing enough to fight anti-fungal resistance? Preventing fungal infections in the body The chronotypes Demystifying the body clock Last updated: Mesenchymal stem cells Cells that can differentiate into connective and lymphatic tissues, and blood vessels. Article #2 in a series on stem cells. Discovery of channel-blocking nanoparticles A solution to plant diseases The effects of nanoparticles on (gut) health Looking at the nanoparticle silicon dioxide Yemen- a neglected humanitarian crisis Impacts of war and arms trade on health. Article #3 in the Global Health Injustices Series. Health gaps in conflicted Kashmir Impact of war and conflict on health. Article #5 in the Global Health Injustices Series. A deep, critical reflection How colonialism, geopolitics and health are interwoven. Article #7 in the Global Health Injustices Series. Previous The interplay of hormones and the microbiome A look at how hormones can affect the gut Health and well-being of Palestinians Impact of war on health. Article #1 in the Global Health Injustices Series. Civil war in Sudan Impact of war on health. Article #2 in the Global Health Injustices Series. Circadian rhythms and nutrition How nutrition timing plays a part in circadian rhythms Syria and Lebanon's diverging yet connected struggles Health challenges stemming from war. Article #4 in the Global Health Injustices Series. Health in Bangladesh's Rohingya community Health challenges stemming from oppression. Article #6 in the Global Health Injustices Series. Next

Captive breeding has grown the California condor population over 18-fold Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp LinkedIn Pinterest Copy link Conserving the California condors 24/04/25, 11:46 Last updated: Published: 04/11/24, 14:56 Captive breeding has grown the California condor population over 18-fold This is article no. 2 in a series on animal conservation. Next article: Beavers are back in Britain . Previous article: The cost of coats: celebrating 55 years of vicuna conservation . California condors are critically endangered birds living on the west coast of North America. Their population decline was first reported in 1953, and they were nearly extinct by 1987. Since then, a captive breeding and reintroduction program has saved the species in the face of multiple human threats. This article will describe some of those threats and available measures to mitigate them. Why California condors became endangered Lead poisoning was the main cause of California condor mortality in the late 20th century. Like vultures, California condors eat dead mammals. When these mammals were shot dead with lead bullets, condors ingested fragments of the bullets, and the lead poisoned their bloodstream. Multiple condors feeding on the same carcass got poisoned, which could be why the population crashed so badly. Today, lead poisoning is the biggest, but not the only, threat to California condor survival ( Figure 1 ). The birds used to be hunted for museums and private collections in the early 20th century, but nowadays, any shootings are accidental. A bigger concern, and the second-most common human-related cause of mortality, is condors colliding with utility poles and power lines. The third-most common is fires: a 2015 study found that every recent wildfire in California has coincided with at least one condor death. Climate change will make these fires more frequent and severe. These threats mainly apply to inland California condors - halogenated organic compound (HOC) pollution is an issue for coastal birds. When coastal condors eat marine mammals contaminated with HOCs, the compounds disrupt their reproductive system and thin their eggshells. In short, humans have created a hostile environment for California condors. Successful captive breeding and population recovery Despite these threats, captive breeding has grown the California condor population over 18-fold ( Figure 2 ). In 1987, all remaining wild condors were captured and bred, with juveniles released to the wild from 1992 onwards. Reintroduced birds are monitored regularly, and poisoned birds are treated with chelation therapy - where a drug binds to lead in the bloodstream and takes it to the kidneys to be filtered out. Since 1995, power line collisions have been avoided by giving juveniles behavioural training before reintroduction. Because of these measures, the California condor mortality rate in the wild decreased from 37.2% in 1992-1994 to 5.4% in 2001-2011. Challenges of conserving California condors Although captive breeding has saved the California condor population, it has also altered behaviours. The original condors stay with one mate longer than reintroduced condors, which may form polygamous relationships. Scientists think that spending so much time with non-family members in captivity has made juveniles promiscuous when reintroduced. Captive bred condors have also gotten used to being fed by people - so they approach people more often, spend longer in areas of human activity, and forage over a smaller area than the original condors. Moreover, condors in southern California were spotted feeding their chicks human litter. These behavioural changes mean the wild California condor population is not self-sustaining. The wild population is also not self-sustaining because condors are still being poisoned ( Figure 3 ). Banning lead bullets is the most effective way to guarantee population growth, but enforcing it has been challenging. Non-toxic alternative bullets like copper cannot find popularity. For population growth, every adult California condor killed is estimated to be worth 2-3 reintroduced juveniles. This is because released juveniles are more vulnerable and take years to reach breeding age. Therefore, American conservationists must keep pressuring authorities to reduce threats to adult California condors. Conclusion Pollution, urbanisation, and climate change have made it hard for the California condor population to recover from decades of lead poisoning. Long generation times and behavioural changes mean captive breeding is the species’ only hope of survival. Perhaps humans are the ones who need to change their behaviour - not feeding California condors and switching to copper bullets would allow these majestic birds to keep roaming the skies. Written by Simran Patel Related articles: Marine iguana conservation / Deception by African birds / Emperor penguins REFERENCES Bakker, V.J. et al. (2024) Practical models to guide the transition of California condors from a conservation-reliant to a self-sustaining species. Biological Conservation . 291: 110447. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320724000089 (Accessed 19th September 2024). D’Elia, J., Haig, S.M., Mullins, T.D. & Miller, M.P. (2016) Ancient DNA reveals substantial genetic diversity in the California Condor (Gymnogyps californianus) prior to a population bottleneck. The Condor . 118 (4): 703–714. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1650/CONDOR-16-35.1 (Accessed 28th September 2024). Finkelstein, M.E. et al. (2023) California condor poisoned by lead, not copper, when both are ingested: A case study. Wildlife Society Bulletin . 47 (3): e1485. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/wsb.1485 (Accessed 28th September 2024). Kelly, T.R. et al. (2015) Two decades of cumulative impacts to survivorship of endangered California condors in California. Biological Conservation . 191: 391–399. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320715300173 (Accessed 28th September 2024). Mee, A. & Snyder, N. (2007) California Condors in the 21st Century - conservation problems and solutions. In: 243–279. Meretsky, V.J., Snyder, N.F.R., Beissinger, S.R., Clendenen, D.A. & Wiley, J.W. (2000) Demography of the California Condor: Implications for Reestablishment. Conservation Biology . 14 (4): 957–967. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99113.x (Accessed 29th September 2024). Stack, M.E. et al. (2022) Assessing Marine Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals in the Critically Endangered California Condor: Implications for Reintroduction to Coastal Environments. Environmental Science & Technology . 56 (12): 7800–7809. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c07302 (Accessed 19th September 2024). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2023) California Condor Population Graph, 1980-2022 | FWS.gov . 18 April 2023. Available from: https://www.fws.gov/media/california-condor-population-graph-1980-2022 (Accessed 28th September 2024). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2020) California Condor Recovery Program 2020 Annual Population Status . Available from: https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2020-California-Condor-Population-Status.pdf (Accessed 28th September 2024). Project Gallery

Its toxicodynamics, and balancing benefits and risks Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp LinkedIn Pinterest Copy link Exploring Ibuprofen 18/09/25, 08:47 Last updated: Published: 17/01/24, 01:28 Its toxicodynamics, and balancing benefits and risks What is Ibuprofen? Ibuprofen is a standard over-the-counter medicine which can be bought from supermarkets and pharmacies. It is primarily used for pain relief, such as back pain, period pain, toothaches, etc. It can also be used for arthritis pain and inflammation. It is available in various forms, including tablets, capsules, gels, and sprays for the skin. The Toxicodynamics of Ibuprofen Toxicodynamics refers to the biological effects of a substance after exposure to it. Scientists look at the mechanisms by which the substance produces toxic effects and the target organs or tissues it affects. Ibuprofen works by stopping the enzymes that synthesise prostaglandins, which are a group of lipid molecules that cause inflammation, including symptoms like redness, heat, swelling and pain. Therefore, after the action of Ibuprofen, inflammatory responses and pain are reduced. Ibuprofen targets organs and tissues, including the gastrointestinal tract, the kidneys, the central nervous system, blood and more. Balancing the Benefits and Risks Ibuprofen’s method of action means it is a safe and effective pain relief medication for most people. It is also easily accessible and easy to use. However, it is able to affect the target organs and tissues negatively and, therefore, can have serious side effects, especially if taken for an extended period of time and/or in high doses. They include heartburn, abdominal pain, kidney damage (especially for people who already have kidney problems), low blood count and more. Therefore, it is important to use Ibuprofen responsibly. This can be done by understanding and being well-informed about its effects on the body, particularly its impact on organs and tissues. With caution and proper use, the side effects can be minimised. One of the easiest ways to lessen side effects is by taking the medication with food. Additionally, patients should take the lowest effective dose for the shortest possible time. If patients have a history of stomach problems, avoiding Ibuprofen and using alternatives is the best solution. Patients can also talk to their GP if they are concerned about the side effects and report any suspected side effects using the Yellow Card safety scheme on the NHS website. Written by Naoshin Haque Related articles: Anthrax toxin / The Pain Gate Theory Project Gallery

Investigating the outbreak in Devon, UK in May 2024 Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp LinkedIn Pinterest Copy link Cryptosporidium: bridging local outbreaks to global health disparities 20/03/25, 12:06 Last updated: Published: 01/09/24, 12:50 Investigating the outbreak in Devon, UK in May 2024 In early May, news emerged of numerous Devon (UK) residents experiencing vomiting and diarrhoea. Majorly affecting the Brixham region, over 40 people were diagnosed with cryptosporidiosis, and over 16,000 homes were advised to boil water before consuming it to kill potential pathogens ( Figure 1 ). Despite a controversial handling of the situation from South West Water (SWW) (from initial denial of the ‘crisis’, to major profit increases for the company), the outbreak was eventually linked to a broken pipe from where animal faeces could have entered, contaminating the water supply, a SWW representative suggested. In this article, we will investigate the disease and its relevance worldwide. So, what is Cryptosporidiosis? Cryptosporidiosis is commonly associated with gastrointestinal symptoms, such as vomiting, diarrhoea and severe abdominal cramps. It is caused by cryptosporidium, from the Apicocomplexa family. This microorganism is an intra-cellular gut parasite which invades the microvilli in the gut and depletes host nutrients. The parasite is spread via faecal-oral transmission, and it is commonly found in contaminated water, food and animals. Its life cycle starts with oocyst (egg) ingestion, leading to attachment to host gut epithelia, and asexual reproduction. This allows sexual reproduction to ensue, and oocyst formation. Eventually, the oocysts are released via faeces, for the cycle of infection to continue. Cryptosporidium species are often identified by the immune system via Toll-Like Receptors, specifically TLR-4, in the gut epithelia; Cryptosporidium-derived molecules are treated as TLR-4 ligands, since the microbe does not produce LPS molecules. Adaptive immune signalling pathways, such as NF-kB, are triggered, encouraging IL-8, CXCL1 and other chemokine secretion from the gut ( Figure 2 ). Consequently, gut inflammation is increased, as well as levels of Intracellular Adhesion Molecule-1 (ICAM-1), to aid immunocyte recruitment and improve pathogenic clearance. Other mechanisms the epithelial barrier uses to eliminate cryptosporidium infection include NO secretion and mucin production, to kill the pathogen, and prevent further infection by blocking extracellular oocyst binding, respectively. In some individuals, cryptosporidium can evade immune response due to its intracellular nature. Most immunocompetent patients suffer mild symptoms and so are offered symptomatic treatment, but some immunocompromised patients (those with HIV, for example) can develop chronic diarrhoea as a result of cryptosporidium infection. In this instance, managing fluid loss and rest is often insufficient; these patients are prescribed nitazoxanide, a broad-spectrum antiparasitic, to manage their diarrhoea. Cryptosporidiosis on a global scale Although controversial, the management of the cryptosporidium ‘crisis’ in Devon was resolved relatively quickly compared to outbreaks in other countries ( Figure 3 ). There are clear links between socio-economic dynamics and water-borne illness prevalence. In some developing regions, such as areas in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), cryptosporidiosis is considered endemic, due to poor quality water-sanitation centres, rapid population growth and inadequate potable water supply. Globally, 3.4 million people die each year from water-borne illnesses - and poor sanitation ranks higher in causes of human morbidity than war and terrorism. Additionally, in 2015, cryptosporidium was the fourth leading cause of death amongst children under 5, clearly highlighting the danger this parasite can cause. For children in developing countries, who are already predisposed to starvation, cryptosporidiosis can kick-start a malnutrition cycle. Here, cryptosporidium exacerbates host malnutrition due to its parasitic nature, potentially causing cognitive impairment and growth stunting. Cryptosporidiosis, although typically mild, can be devastating for some people (the immunocompromised and young children). Particularly, those who are malnourished can suffer severe effects. The water contamination in Devon (UK), handled by SWW, was unfortunate and many in the region experienced severe illness. Globally, cryptosporidiosis is a major problem and in some regions, it is considered endemic. Thus, it is important we spread awareness of the devastating effects of this disease, continue efforts to prevent transmission and strive for eradication. Written by Eloise Nelson REFERENCES Abuseir, S. (2023) ‘A systematic review of frequency and geographic distribution of water-borne parasites in the Middle East and North Africa’, Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal , 29(2), pp. 151–161. doi:10.26719/emhj.23.016. Chalmers, R.M., Davies, A.P. and Tyler, K. (2019) ‘Cryptosporidium’, Microbiology , 165(5), pp. 500–502. doi:10.1099/mic.0.000764. Hassan, E.M. et al. (2020) ‘A review of cryptosporidium spp. and their detection in water’, Water Science and Technology , 83(1), pp. 1–25. doi:10.2166/wst.2020.515. News, S. (2024) ‘Brixham: More than 50 people in Devon ill from contaminated water - as South West Water’s owner posts £166m profit’, Sky News , 21 May. Available at: https://news.sky.com/story/brixham-more-than-50-people-in-devon-ill-from-contaminated-water-as-south-west-waters-owner-posts-166m-profit-13140820#:~:text=More%20than%2050%20cases%20of,water%2C%20health%20bosses%20have%20said . Sparks, H. et al. (2015) ‘Treatment of cryptosporidium: What we know, gaps, and the way forward’, Current Tropical Medicine Reports , 2(3), pp. 181–187. doi:10.1007/s40475-015-0056-9. Caccio SM. Cryptosporidium : parasite and disease, Immunology of Cryptosporidiosis. Springer Verlag Gmbh; 2016. Project Gallery

Using toxins for pain management Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp LinkedIn Pinterest Copy link Anthrax Toxin Last updated: 18/09/25, 08:45 Published: 03/04/25, 07:00 Using toxins for pain management Introduction Pain is a response and signal to organisms that there is damage to the body. This could be due to an infection, tissue damage or organ damage. Different types of pain medication have been manufactured in the last decade. This includes the artificial manufacture of opioids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as ibuprofen, using pathogens like bacteria and other substances. Bacteria have been investigated for managing and treating pain, with varying levels of effectiveness. Research by Yang et al. (2021) has shown that bacteria can interact with organisms and communicate with the nervous system, leading to analgesia (pain relief). Bacteria can also activate nociceptors, receptors that respond to pain, to alert the organism of damage. These nociceptors can also detect bacterial processes that release pain-producing toxins. Yang et al.’s research specifically looked at the bacterial toxin Bacillus anthracis ( Figure 1 ). It is a significant factor in the spread of anthrax, an infectious disease, and their experiments showed that it can lead to analgesia, as Bacillus anthracis and nociceptors can work together to suppress pain. The experiment The experiment by Yang et al. looked at different methods to target and suppress specific nociceptive neurons to decrease pain in mammals using bacteria. The study focused on the interactions between nociceptors and Bacillus anthracis . The researchers found that Bacillus anthracis toxin was made up of three substances: protective antigen (PA), lethal factor (LF), and edema factor (EF), as shown in Figure 2 . They created edema toxin (ET) using PA and EF, and administered the ET to mice via the intrathecal route (through the spinal canal, also shown in Figure 2 ). The scientists used different doses of PA, LF and EF. The intrathecal route was used to limit the diffusion of ET to the spinal cord and sensory neurons, preventing ET from moving into other organs. The researchers then analysed the mouse neurons to compare the sequences before and after the experiments and determine the effectiveness of the treatments. The results indicated high levels of ANTXR2 receptors (high-affinity receptors for anthrax toxins), meaning the response to pain was faster. The results The researchers examined the mechanical sensitivity and thermal latency. Mechanical sensitivity is the ability to differentiate between and respond to mechanical stimuli, and thermal latency is the ability to differentiate between and respond to heat stimuli. In mammals, signs of pain can be quantified using these indicators. The higher the threshold, the lower the pain. The threshold levels of these factors were compared up to 24 hours after the injections of the PA, PA + LF and PA + EF, as shown in Figure 3. Figure 3 : Line graphs showing the results of the intrathecal injections. (A) Line graph of mechanical sensitivity thresholds after intrathecal administration. (B) Line graph of thermal sensitivity thresholds after intrathecal administration. (C) Line graph of mechanical sensitivity thresholds on the day and 24 hours after the second injection. After administration of the injections via the intrathecal route, thresholds of mechanical sensitivity, Figure 3A , were increased significantly for several hours. The injection of PA + EF resulted in the highest threshold, remaining at 1.0 g 6 hours post-injection, compared to the injections of PA and PA + LF, which both had a threshold of below 0.5 g 6 hours post-injection. The thresholds of thermal latency, shown in Figure 3B , also increased significantly for several hours. Again, the injection of PA + EF resulted in the highest latency, remaining for more than 20 seconds 6 hours post-injection, compared to the injections of PA and PA + LF, which both had a latency of below 20 seconds 6 hours post-injection. The results from Figures 3A and 3B suggest that the injections of PA + EF were the most effective in increasing the thresholds of both mechanical sensitivity and thermal latency. A second injection of ET was administered, and thresholds of mechanical sensitivity were again elevated, as shown in Figure 3C . After the second injection, the effects of pain relief were more potent. In the graph, at D2, the threshold of mechanical sensitivity 6 hours after the second injection was above 1.5 g for mice given ET, compared to below 1.0 g 6 hours after the first injection for mice given ET. This could be due to the upregulation of the ANTXR2 receptors induced by ET. Upregulation is when hormone secretion is suppressed, and the number of receptors (in this case, ANTXR2) increases, causing a faster response to the stimulus (in this case, pain). This suggests that ET can result in pain receptors being affected, leading to a faster analgesic response. The researchers concluded that this experiment did result in analgesia in mice as ET targeted specific nociceptors. The results from this experiment are significant because they indicate that pain behaviour can be blocked by intrathecal administration of a harmful bacterial toxin such as Bacillus anthracis . Conclusion Yang et al. (2021) found that the injection of the ET via the intrathecal route results in blocked pain behaviour in mice. The experiment is significant as it has shown that a harmful toxin can have positive effects. However, it is difficult to know if the effects will be replicated in humans as human trials have not yet been carried out. In addition, the sample size was very small, with a maximum of eight mice observed after each injection. This could result in high variability (the data points would be more spread out from the mean and, therefore, less consistent) and inconclusive results. Nevertheless, with further study, experimentation, and refinement of the ET via the intrathecal method, new therapies for people with pain, especially chronic pain, could be created in the future. Different dosages of the ET could be experimented upon to see whether a higher dosage has better results, with a bigger sample size, and human trials. The results from Yang et al. (2021) showed that intrathecal ET injections are promising, and if successful in humans, this method would ease the burden on healthcare systems worldwide. Written by Naoshin Haque Related articles: Ibuprofen / The Pain Gate Theory Project Gallery

Healthy heart, healthy mind Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp LinkedIn Pinterest Copy link How does physical health affect mental health? Last updated: 16/10/25, 10:20 Published: 30/01/25, 08:00 Healthy heart, healthy mind Introduction Over the last decade, maintaining good mental health has become an increasing global priority. More people are committing time to self-care meditation, and other cognitive practices. We have also seen a rise in people taking care of their physical health through exercise and clean eating. This is fantastic – people are making time for one of the most important aspects of life, their health! But with the fast-paced nature of modern lifestyles, it is hard to devote separate time each week to purely mental and physical wellbeing. What if there were ways we could enhance both physical and mental wellbeing at the same time? Are both forms of health completely distinct from one another, or could a change in one have an effect on the other? If you’re looking for ways to improve your self-care efficiency, this may be the article for you! Healthy heart, healthy mind Physical health is a lot easier to define, on account of it being largely visible. Mental health on the other hand lacks much of a concrete definition. What is widely agreed is that emotions and feelings play a large part in making up our mental health. Emotions are largely determined by how we feel about our current internal and external environment, meaning bad bodily signs (as part of our internal environment) will have a negative effect on our overall mood. This is why being ill puts us in such a bad mood – even a blocked nose can annoy us by affecting how we do everyday activities. Poor fitness levels are likely no different – not being the most physically capable and finding everyday physical tasks challenging will likely have an effect on your mood and your confidence. Recent studies have backed up this idea, namely that signs of bodily inflammation are associated with increased risk of depression and negative mood. The role of neurotransmitters So being physically fit is associated with having better mental health, but does that mean exercise itself is mentally health as well, or is it just the effect of exercise that makes us happy? In other words, we seem to enjoy the result, but do we enjoy the process too? Studies have found that exercise increases dopamine levels in the brain. Dopamine is a neurotransmitter (a chemical messenger in the brain) that signals reward and motivation, similar to when we earn something for the work we put in ( Figure 1 ). Exercise is therefore seen as rewarding to the brain. There is also a lot of evidence suggesting exercise increases serotonin levels in both rats and humans. Serotonin is also a neurotransmitter, associated with directly enhancing mood and even having anti-depressant effects. Experiments in rats even suggest that increases in serotonin can decrease anxiety levels. Now, this does not mean exercise alone can cure anxiety disorder or depression, but could it be a useful variable in a clinical setting? Clinical uses Studies in depressive patients suggest that, yes, exercise does lead to better mental and physical health in patients with depression. This pairs well with another common finding that depressed patients are very rarely willing to complete difficult tasks for reward. So even on an extreme clinical scale, mental ill-health can have very damning consequences on maintaining good physical health. On the other hand, simple activities such as light jogs or walks may be the key to reversing negative spirals and getting on the right track towards recovery ( Figure 2 ). Conclusion and what we can do So far we have pretty solid evidence that mental health can impact physical health and vice versa, both negatively and positively. Going back to the introductory question, yes! We can find activities that improve both our physical and mental health. The trick is to find exercises that we find enjoyable and rewarding. On the clinical side, this could mean that physical exercise may be as effective at remitting depressive symptoms as antidepressants, likely with a lot fewer side effects. With that said, stay active and have fun, it helps more than you think! Written by Ramim Rahman Related articles: Environmental factors in exercise / Stress and neurodegeneration / Personal training / Mental health awareness REFERENCES Nord, C. (2024) The balanced brain . Cambridge: Penguin Random House. Osimo, E.F. et al. (2020) ‘Inflammatory markers in depression: A meta-analysis of mean differences and variability in 5,166 patients and 5,083 controls’, Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 87, pp. 901–909. doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2020.02.010. Basso, J.C. and Suzuki, W.A. (2017) ‘The effects of acute exercise on mood, cognition, neurophysiology, and neurochemical pathways: A Review’, Brain Plasticity , 2(2), pp. 127–152. doi:10.3233/bpl-160040. [figure 1] DiCarlo, G.E. and Wallace, M.T. (2022) ‘Modeling dopamine dysfunction in autism spectrum disorder: From invertebrates to vertebrates’, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 133, p. 104494. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.12.017. [figure 2] Donvito, T. (2020) Cognitive behavioral therapy for arthritis: Does it work? what’s it like?, CreakyJoints. Available at: https://creakyjoints.org/living-with-arthritis/mental-health/cognitive-behavioral-therapy-for-arthritis/ (Accessed: 06 December 2024) Project Gallery